Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A few months later the United Nations Security Council supported a comprehensive plan ending Israel’s murderous war in GazaIsrael’s defense minister has approved a heavy-duty project to allow external security forces in a narrow pocket of the destroyed part.
Israeli journalists reported on Sunday that the so-called International Stabilization Force (ISF)part of the “peace plan” of the President of the United States Donald Trump, which has 20 points, will include 200 members from countries such as Morocco and Uganda who are going to the known “test” area south of the city of Rafah.
Although international officials have accepted the move, experts describe the limited deployment as a calculated diplomatic strategy that has little effect because the US-backed peace process has stalled and Israel’s situation has been compromised. a deadly attack keep going.
Rather than a real step towards peace, he says, the move is a political ploy designed to undermine US pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. to Washington This week, I am re-establishing the territorial division of the Gaza Strip.
“Netanyahu is going to Washington to say ‘no’ to many demands to leave the Strip, says Wissam Afifa, a political analyst in Gaza. Instead, he is offering this alternative: ‘Take this small piece, stick to what you have achieved, and play in a more restricted area.’
Back-to-back forces are ‘rubber toys’
The Israeli daily newspaper Haaretz reported that the first plan is to send 500 Moroccan soldiers to the refugee camp in the city. A significant reduction of only 200 soldiers may indicate that Israel’s political security ministry has decided to divide the operation into smaller, more controlled units.
The army will work in coordination with the Israeli army. According to the Israeli reporter Ynet, Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir he was the only member of his cabinet who voted against the actionHe argues that the Palestinian group Hamas failed to fulfill its commitment to disarmament and insists that “the solution to the problem in Gaza is to encourage migration”.
Israeli journalists also reported that the government says that the Israeli army will continue to control the “Yellow Line” – an arbitrary border that puts up to 70 percent of the Gaza Strip under strict Israeli control – and that there will be no withdrawal until Hamas disarms all of its weapons.
The original framework approved by UNSC Resolution 2803 he called for the deployment of an international army along with the Palestinian Authority.
Earlier this month, Hamas announced that it would dissolve its government in Gaza and hand over power to a new Palestinian Authority called the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza.NCAG).
Professionals he said The move by Hamas may have been designed to pressure Israel and demonstrate the group’s commitment to providing leadership and allowing the rebuilding of the territory.
The pilot program also sees the entry of NCAG to oversee civilian affairs in Gaza. However, according to Haaretz, the Palestinian police accompanying them will be disarmed, allowed to carry only “rubber batons and tasers”.
Meanwhile, ground preparation seems to be progressing to accommodate the new security infrastructure. Israel’s military radio recently released a video showing an army building in the southern part of the “Gaza envelope” near the Karem Abu Salem (Kerem Shalom) crossing.
The station also said that the larger facility is being built specifically to accommodate incoming troops before they are deployed.
Although Israel’s restrictions were difficult, Nickolay Mladenovthe chief representative of Peace Councilhe welcomed the decision of the Israeli cabinet, praising it as “an important part of the agreed plan to stabilize Gaza, help end the conflict, and support the transition to the Palestinian Authority”.
Washington’s ‘sweetener’
In order to understand the timing and the factors that led to this decision, experts pointed to the diplomatic inconsistencies that occurred during the US peace process. Trump’s plan saw a more limited approach, linked to the handing over of Gaza to the technical committee. However, the plan has been stalled due to Israel’s refusal to link the cease-fire with political activities and its refusal to withdraw gradually.
Afifa has said that the “failure” of the administration is the result of the administration. kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe ka kayendetsedwe kamwemwebubu kapanimwemwemwenkemwekhumwe kuyi lugha ukhale nawo kwa iwo asinthe.
With Netanyahu on his way to Washington, the Israeli prime minister was in dire need of a deal, Afifa said. The cabinet’s decision, quickly passed via telephone vote during a Knesset break to avoid a breakdown in internal consensus, provides exactly that, he added.
Mamoun Abu Amer, an expert on Israeli affairs, echoed this. He saw the cabinet’s quick vote as an attempt to fend off US pressure and show an image of following Trump, while changing the core principles of the deal to align with Israel’s long-term security strategy.
Abu Amer also said that Israel has turned Resolution 2803 upside down both selectively and constitutionally.
“This is an entry point,” Abu Amer said. The original draft means that the NCAG will enter Gaza, the ISF will deploy and the Israeli army will withdraw from the new lines to allow for a settlement. Instead, Israel wants to deploy weapons first, keeping the technical committee surrounded within Israel’s security envelope.
Abu Amer also said that it is necessary for the Palestinian police to only carry rubber batons and tasers, showing the premeditated strategy of Israel to remove the Palestinian leadership from the real power of security, making them small contractors who manage the destruction of towns in the most damaged areas under the regular army.
The NCAG itself seemed to reject the Israeli proposal. In a recent statement, the committee announced that it would only take responsibility for Gaza after the UNSC approved the deployment of troops and, unfortunately, the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces.
‘false witnesses’
The facts on the ground of the Israeli plan show a path of great division and long-term control, experts said, pointing to the decision of the minister to prevent the ISF and technical experts from working outside the “Yellow Line”.
Afifa warned that turning the small enclave of Rafah into an “experimental bubble” undermines the idea of Gaza as a single enclave.
“This raises a big question about the future of two million people,” he said. “If the entire project is reduced to a few thousand people selected according to Israeli law, it means that the international community will leave two million Gazans in the most vulnerable position for humanitarian aid while Israel says it is implementing a peace plan.”
This also carries significant diplomatic risks for participating countries. Israeli journalists also reported that the minister’s decision said that those who provide ISF must be countries that have a peace agreement with Israel and do not pursue laws against it in international forums.
“It is not wise for an Arab country like Morocco to be a party supporting Netanyahu to achieve his political goals,” Abu Amer said, urging the participating countries to reject Israel’s reformed strategy and insist on its withdrawal.
Failure to do so, he warned, would reduce foreign forces to security guards, acting as “false witnesses” to continue to subjugate and destroy the Palestinian people.
