Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

By the time New York’s 12th Democratic primary ends in June, Anthropic and OpenAI will have spent millions in their battle over the political future of AI: who will control, or who will be punished to try control it. But the winner of their argument may be the person they’re fighting right now: the notorious New York State Assemblyman, who made Streisand the son of an AI security guard.
Starting in late 2025, Leading the Future, a high-profile PAC backed by OpenAI, Palantir, and a16z executives, has spent millions against Alex Bores, who wrote one of the country’s first AI laws. The PAC is hoping to kill off his bid for the seat being vacated by longtime Democrat Jerry Nadler. In fact, Bores is now the front-runner in an eight-person race to be the “face of Manhattan,” as it were. new York Recently a magazine put it on the cover.
And amazingly, they pulled it all off without launching a massive marketing campaign. In fact, the Bores campaign said so Seaside that it first bought in New York on May 11, about seven months after Bores entered the race and a few weeks before the polls closed on June 23. In contrast, Guiding the Future, whose supporters include Joe Lonsdale, Marc Andreessen, and Greg Brockman of OpenAI, has been. Advertising in Bores from December 2025spending $2.4 million according to recent reports.
In any case, a corporate-backed, multi-billionaire super PAC, which is allowed to raise and spend unlimited amounts of money on candidates or get out on the ballot as long as it’s not related to the campaign, can destroy what they want to remember. The group leading Tsogolo had already done well in the 2024 election, removing Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Rep. Katie Porter (D-CA) via Fairshake, the crypto industry’s top PAC. And it would have been successful in Manhattan: Back in December, Think Big PAC, which is affiliated with Leading the Future, spent $120,000 to run a single anti-Bores ad on television and digital. “It’s very expensive to advertise in the New York primary,” said Lis Smith, a New York political activist who ran Pete Buttigieg’s 2020 presidential campaign, whose work also involved Govs. Andrew Cuomo and Eliot Spitzer. “The New York media market is the most expensive market in the country. You can kill any airtime.”
When Bores entered the race last October, the former Palantir employee-turned-government official faced several others with well-known names and longtime supporters. Micah Lasher, his New York State Assembly colleague, is backed by Nadler’s New York political machine, as well as Mike Bloomberg’s PAC chief. Jack Schlossberg, activist and grandson of John F. Kennedy, has the support of the National Democratic establishment nostalgic for Camelot. George Conway, a critic of Donald Trump and the ex-husband of former Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway, has won the Never Trumper campaign. “I’ll be honest, (Bores) wasn’t that well known before he became a target of these AI companies,” Smith said.
When asked, Josh Vlasto, spokesman for Leading the Future, said, “From day one, we’ve said what’s happening now: Alex Bores was bought and sold by Anthropic, who invests in it like Chris Larsen, the Altruist group, a financial technology group. They should buy themselves AI control for any group or proponent who thinks that by helping Alex Bores take billions is either stupid or needs a quick Google search.”
Instead of disrupting Bores’ election, however, the AI industry simply raised his profile. A new study was released last week by Emerson College shows him neck and neck with Lasher, trailing him by two points, and Bores has always been. he topped his opponents in recent elections. In an ironic twist, Leading the Future’s ad became a charitable donation to the Bores campaign, in a free, multimillion-dollar campaign that made an effort to inform voters that Bores had existed.
“For people who didn’t do well in their own minds, they did very well.”
Alyssa Cass, a spokeswoman for Bores’ campaign, said she initially thought it would be difficult to get voters to care about AI security. “AI (policy) is its strength, but it will take a lot of work for us to implement it in the government,” he said. Seaside. “And they, starting in December, began to do the work for us, to raise awareness of AI and AI laws, and to make people think: Who are these people? What do they want to do to me, and to our people? For people who were not rational, they acted quickly. “
Suddenly, voters who did not know about Bores were receiving letters and advertisements that described him as anti-AI and pro-regulation, showing that he wrote the RAISE Act, a law of the state of New York that put restrictions on the release of AI types of borders and was signed into law in December.
The ad was an accidental boost: The more Leading the Future attacked Bores, the more it became visible, and more voters realized that the big PAC with the help of Silicon Valley AI billionaires was trying to influence the Manhattan election, especially targeting the person who wants to control AI. It also gave Bores “this” that distinguishes him from the other seven Democrats who are running in Manhattan on the platform of impeachment against Donald Trump: He was, in fact, being evaluated by the billions of technology that give to Trump’s ballroom to change AI. Polling during the campaign, in fact, shows that voters who received negative information about Bores were more likely to vote for him.
It also didn’t hurt that the AI industry’s commercials were easy for Bores to mock. One of their first ads criticized Bores for working at Palantir at a time when the controversial tech company had a deal with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and said Bores was a fraud because he said he wanted to eliminate ICE. Bores filed a defamation suit against LTF, saying he left Palantir because he objected to its relationship with ICE. He also said on social media that it was “shocking” that the Palantir billionaire was attacking him work in Palantir.
And this was even before Anthropic intervention led to this race in world awareness. In February, the Jobs and Democracy PAC, which is affiliated with the pro-regulation super PAC Public First Action, announced it would support Bores. Products like The New Yorker, The New York Times, and Politics began to cover the fight against Bores as part of the old conflict between OpenAI and Anthropic, an AI company that positions itself as the most responsible for frontier laboratories – and just donated $ 20 million to Public First Action, in direct opposition to Leading the Future and its ties to OpenAI.
Such exposure is not uncommon in House competitions. “You can kill any earned media, you can kill any paid media,” Smith said. “So the fact that he’s getting all these paid ads, when he was unknown outside of the political arena before – it’s a gift.”