Trump’s supporters have pushed for the announcement of the Iran deal while Democrats want to clarify | US-Israel War on Iran News

Washington, DC – The new agreement to end the US-Israel war on Iran is being hailed as a victory for US President Donald Trump and his allies, although the terms of the agreement remain unclear.

The praise of the supporters was poured to the US President on Sunday, although there are questions about what will be included in the first agreement of the agreement that should be signed on Friday, and which issues, such as the nuclear program of Iran, would be open for negotiations after the agreement.

Recommended Articles

list of things 3end of series

US Vice President JD Vance also referred to the drop in oil prices shortly after the announcement as he spoke of a “new era” for the Middle East.

“What the president has done is create a real space to change the region,” he told Fox News, adding that, “I think we can say with confidence, that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon”.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio linked the announcement to Trump’s 80th birthday on Sunday.

“America is fortunate to have a leader with the greatest courage, the greatest strength, the greatest sense of humor, and the greatest love of country,” he wrote on X.

Several Republicans took to social media to praise Trump as a “trader”.

Congressman Robert Aderholt repeated Trump’s statement that the pending agreement with Iran would put limits on Tehran’s nuclear program beyond 2015. Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

The agreement, which Trump withdrew in 2018, was implemented under the leadership of US President Barack Obama. He saw Tehran curtailing its nuclear program to ease sanctions. Tehran has maintained for years that it does not want a nuclear weapon.

“Unlike the agreement reached under the Obama administration, this agreement will not allow Iran to continue to enrich uranium and create the components necessary to develop nuclear weapons,” Aderholt said.

But there was no indication that the memo would include the latest developments in Tehran’s nuclear program.

Both sides said the initial agreement would stop fighting on all sides, including in Lebanon.

US, Pakistani and Iranian officials have also said that the signing of the deal will restore traffic in the Strait of Hormuz and lift the US military blockade of Iranian ports.

But Iranian officials for many days said that the first agreement would be the beginning of 60 days of negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program, as well as other more serious issues, including the management of the future of the strait.

Both sides have also offered different accounts of when the US will begin to free up frozen goods and lift sanctions as part of any deal. US officials stressed that this would not happen immediately and could only happen if the commitments are fulfilled after the signing.

US Senator Lindsey Graham, a long-time supporter of Iran’s violent extremists, was among those who celebrated the revelations on Sunday.

However, he also pointed out the differences between the US and Iran’s communications.

“I am concerned that Iran’s views on the deal seem to be different from what the American negotiating team is saying,” he wrote in a post on X.

Democrats want clarity

Democrats, meanwhile, have been questioning for months whether launching a joint war with Israel on February 28 would advance US interests.

The Trump administration has said its goals include degrading Iran’s military capabilities and destroying its nuclear program.

Trump and his administration also said they hoped the war would lead to regime change in Iran. This did not happen, with experts saying that the embattled government is on the brink of military defeat, despite the assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and many other officials.

Khamenei’s son, Mojtaba Khamenei, has succeeded his father.

Speaking to NS Now on Saturday, Representative Seth Moulton criticized the terms of the memorandum of understanding as “essentially a commitment document from Donald Trump to the supreme leader of Iran”.

“I mean, $100bn of taxpayers’ money has already been invested in this war, 14 Americans have died, and we get an agreement that just reopens the problems that were already open before the war? he said.

The top Democrat on the House of Representatives’ Foreign Affairs Committee, Gregory Meeks, on Sunday said that “Trump’s election war was wrong and damaging to American interests”.

However, he said he welcomed the renewed interest in the meetings, although he wanted to be clear about any deal.

“The American people deserve more than vague announcements or political meddling,” he said in a statement.

“They deserve security, clear answers and confidence that this administration will not repeat the failures that led us to an illegal and expensive war”.

Expect more battles

Robert Malley, the lead negotiator of the JCPOA under the Obama administration, said the agreement to be signed on Friday is “an important and welcome victory” as it is expected to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

“Also the MOU is a clear and vindictive evidence of the war that already existed, especially because what it accomplishes is reopening the waterway that was closed as a result of the war,” he wrote in a letter on X.

“The issues that need to be addressed after the MOU – the future of Iran’s nuclear program; the status of its enriched uranium; the level of sanctions – will be left for later, and will be more difficult to resolve than before the war,” he said.

Sina Toossi, head of the Center for International Policy Think Tank, echoed the sentiment.

“Make no mistake: if you had told the biggest fans of the war in February that this would be (the sequel), they would have been scared,” he said in a post on X.

“There is no regime change. There is no submission to Iran on their many demands. This is very difficult,” he said.

And while lower oil prices offer hope for Trump, who has seen his approval ratings plummet amid the war’s economic woes, it remains to be seen whether negative attitudes toward the war will change.

The 60-day deadline for several key issues expires in August, as the US enters the final campaign before the midterm elections in November.

In an interview with the New York Times late Friday, Trump said he could launch another attack on Iran if a nuclear deal is not reached by then.

In turn, he said that he could make the US “the manager of the Middle East”, if the region pays Washington 20 percent of its income.