Apple is taking Epic’s fight over store prices to the Supreme Court

According to ReutersThe Supreme Court may hear the case at its next session, which will begin in October.

Apple’s math may be debatable

Apple’s filing said that Epic hopes the court battle will end with Apple paying a de minimis fee to developers who want to have more control over how tasks are completed in their apps.

In the lawsuit, which is pending Supreme Court review, Epic hopes to force Apple to show receipts explaining why commission rates are so high.

Meanwhile, Apple has said that the fee “ensures that Apple continues to receive compensation for the use of IP-protected devices, technologies, and services – which attract developers and support software development.”

For example, with Epic, Apple claims to buy even one “skin”. Fortnite players buy to make their character look special requires a fee. These committees help Apple create and improve “the iPhone image that displays it, the iPhone controls that control the display, the Apple silicon chip that controls all iOS apps, the software development tools that Epic uses to create. Fortnite for iOS, and the App Store platform that downloads, updates, and stores the app,” he said.

If the Supreme Court agrees with Apple and reverses the findings, Apple hopes to stop sharing “business secrets related to the company’s decision-making on the App Store, its implementation of connected purchases for developers, and its internal discussions about compliance with the law.”

Meanwhile, the UK is also hoping to analyze Apple’s real earnings. The CMA said Apple “may charge a fee” for allowing the connection, “but that these fees must be used responsibly,” the Guardian reported. Like Epic, the Coalition for App Fairness said that each app store’s “charges must be justified by ‘transparent data’ from Apple and Google to explain any costs to technology companies.”

Apple did not immediately respond to Ars’ request for comment.