The decision to reveal the hidden… Why did Guardiola escape from Italy’s hell?

The philosopher does not give up the factors of success

Spain’s Pep Guardiola’s resignation from coaching Italy was not just a personal decision, but rather exposed many of the problems the Azzurri have experienced in recent years and reopened questions about the reasons for the decline of one of the world’s greatest teams, which failed to qualify for the World Cup for the third time in a row.

Guardiola was shortlisted by the Italian Football Federation to lead the national team in the hope of restoring his lost reputation, but the Spanish coach decided not to go through with the attempt and later turned his attention to other, less glamorous options.

Tools that don’t match Guardiola’s ideas

Anyone who knows Guardiola’s philosophy realizes that he does not accept any project without having the appropriate tools for its implementation. The Spanish manager depends on the quality of the players, the ability to control the ball and control the pace of the match, which above all requires elements with exceptional skills.

However, the current reality of the Italian national team is completely different. Talent is scarcer than it used to be and the Italian league no longer produces the same number of players capable of leading the modern football project, making the implementation of Guardiola’s ideas a very difficult task.

It is no coincidence that his greatest successes have reached exceptional generations. From Barcelona with Xavi, Iniesta and Messi to star-studded Bayern Munich to Manchester City where he got all the deals and opportunities he needed.

The crisis runs deeper than the coach’s name

Italy’s problem doesn’t just stop at the lack of talent, but extends to the entire project management method, as the Italian federation has been confused about technical decisions for years, which has directly reflected in the team’s results.

Read also… The end of the controversy.. Rodri steps into Real Madrid.

After Guardiola’s rejection, the federation moved to appoint Andrea Pirlo, although his coaching experience is still limited and he has not achieved the success that would allow him to lead a team the size of Italy during one of the most difficult periods in Italian football history.

This transformation reflects the magnitude of the crisis within the federation and confirms that the problem is not only with the coach, but in the absence of a clear plan to restore the national team to a healthy footing.

Two philosophies that do not meet

There is also a tactical aspect that cannot be overlooked, as Italian football has historically been based on defensive discipline, organization and realism in game management, while Guardiola represents a completely different school based on absolute possession, high pressing and playing from the back with high risk in all phases of the game.

Although Pep has managed to develop his ideas over the years, implementing them requires players who believe in them and execute them well, which may not be available in the current Italy squad.

Therefore, it seems that Guardiola did not reject the name Italy so much as he rejected the circumstances surrounding it, convinced that success requires an integrated project that starts with management, goes through talent and ends with the coach, and not the other way around.

Source link