US judge slams prosecutor in Charlie Kirk murder case | Court Affairs


The judge said statements to the media by the defendants in the trial violate the rules on what can be said outside of court.

The Utah judge presiding over the murder of Charlie Kirk has criticized the jury for making comments to the media about co-accused Tyler Robinson.

On Friday, Judge Tony Graf said the comments violated his rules on what the two sides can say in the case outside of court.

Recommended Articles

list of things 3end of series

But Graf rejected the defense’s request to take the death penalty off the table as a penalty for the violation.

He said that the problem can be solved by investigating and asking questions to people who want to be judges, which aims to remove people who may be biased in the case.

Robinson, a 23-year-old from southwestern Utah, was not involved.

He is charged with aggravated manslaughter in the September 10 killing of Kirk, a friend of the President of the United States. Donald Trump who was shot in the neck while addressing thousands of people at Utah Valley University.

Defense attorneys accused Utah County Deputy District Attorney Christopher Ballard of trying to influence potential jurors by going on a “media tour” to talk about forensic evidence in the case. Ballard also said prosecutors have enough evidence to show that Robinson killed Kirk.

Legal experts said that abolishing the death penalty would be a solution to the problem. Graf said it would have been “highly inconsistent” with the errors.

Ballard said he has the right to speak to the media to correct errors in the ballistics experts’ findings.

Initial tests by experts did not match the bullet with the gun that investigators believe was used to kill Kirk. This prompted stories in other publications that raised questions about the prosecution’s case.

For example, a March 30 headline in the United Kingdom’s Daily Mail newspaper said that the bullet that killed Kirk “doesn’t match” the gun that investigators say was used.

Ballard said he was trying to “set the record straight” when he told news agencies that ballistics tests were inconclusive to determine whether the bullet was fired from the suspected killer’s weapon.

The mere thought of this evidence fueled speculation that there may have been a second shooter, or that Kirk’s death was accidental. Lawyers for both sides have argued that fake news and media attention could damage the jury pool.

Graf said the comments about the bullet did not violate court rules, but Ballard went too far when he said the prosecution had “sufficient evidence to show beyond a reasonable doubt that Tyler Robinson killed someone”.

The judge said these additional statements in public have a “great chance” of disproving the case.

The judge added that his comments were not made to undermine the court, and that his decision was inconsistent with the charges against Robinson.

“The goal is to establish a common law for attorney supervision,” Graf said.

Authorities say DNA matching Robinson’s was found on the trigger, a cartridge case, two blank cartridges and a towel used to wrap the gun.

The Associated Press has left phone and email messages seeking comment from prosecutors and Robinson’s attorneys.



Source link

اترك ردّاً

لن يتم نشر عنوان بريدك الإلكتروني. الحقول الإلزامية مشار إليها بـ *