‘You could have been great’: Trump faces Israeli anger over Iran deal | US-Israel War on Iran News

The growing conflict between the United States and Israel came to a head this week, with stories published in major Israeli publications accusing President Donald Trump of abandoning Israel to its arch-enemy following its deal with Iran.

Analysts described the betrayal as public and political outrage over the deal, which details the principles of ending the US-Israel war on Iran, the main topics.

Recommended Articles

list of 4 itemsend of series

In one of the most dangerous attacks, one person known as “You could have been the greatest president ever, but you failed” accused Trump of signing a “commitment agreement with a murderous and brutal government”.

Published in one of the country’s leading newspapers, Israel Hayomfeaturing Trump’s top donor Miriam Adelson, the piece pulled a few punches.

Written as a letter to Trump, it went further than even some Israeli politicians who opposed the deal, accusing the US President of turning the hour of war into a new war and of bringing “shame” to his country.

“The big smile on the face of former President Barack Obama was a huge mockery of the man who described his agreement as the worst,” it said, referring to the nuclear deal signed in 2015 that Trump. he left starting three years later on his first term.

Hagai Ram, a professor at Ben Gurion University and author of the book Iranophobia: The Logic of an Israel Obsession, said Trump was until recently “the most popular person in Israel” – but now he has turned into a “villain”.

The incident came down to “phobia” and “the whole idea of ​​Americans turning against Israel” following the agreement which was framed by the media as an “Iranian trap”, he added.

A broken marriage?

The US-Israeli alliance is often considered one of the closest in modern history.

Since playing a major role in the establishment of its country in 1948, the US has supported Israel through many conflicts and often ignored international law in the treatment of the Palestinian people, especially in the decades that have been closed and attacked the Gaza Strip.

However, while there have been previous disputes, no one seems to be denying the current dispute over this week’s US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) – although observers have been quick to note that the long-standing agreement remains strong.

Iran, for many Israelis, is the enemy of their country and the war against it is, for all intents and purposes, presented as such. Over the years, Israeli politicians, including current Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have been he said that Iran is on the verge of acquiring a nuclear weapon and, together with its allies including the Lebanese army, Hezbollah, is still ready to destroy Israel.

However, according to the agreement, negotiated without the involvement of Israel, all fighting, including the attack that began in Lebanon at the beginning of March, had to end immediately. In addition, both parties had to commit to honoring the terms of the MoU to be mentioned being the “integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon”, of which Israel currently owns one-fifth.

This has not gone well in Israel.

A survey conducted by Israel’s Channel 12 TV on Thursday seemed to rest on years of support for the US public, and Trump in particular.

According to the survey, only 11 percent of Israelis felt that their country had “won” the war that the US and Israel launched against Iran at the end of February, and 71 percent said that they no longer trusted the Trump administration to protect Israel’s interests in negotiations with Iran established according to the MoU.

Confusion over US intentions is not limited to the public. Although Netanyahu has not spoken publicly about the terms of the agreement, Israel’s continued presence in Lebanon and allegations that Hezbollah has violated its terms have given enough indication to observers that he does not see himself as bound by it.

Others within his cabinet have been more direct, with right-wing Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Defense Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir publicly criticizing the deal.

“With all due respect to the American people, Israel must make it clear to the whole world that the blood of our children and the safety of our citizens will not be removed. The whole of Lebanon must burn,” said Ben-Gvir in an X post that was later banned for violating the platform’s rules.

‘truth bomb’

US figures have been impressed by the visibility of their discussions in Israeli politics and the media. At the G7 on Wednesday, Trump told reporters that Netanyahu was “a little bit happy” about the attack on Lebanon.

The US Vice President, JD Vance, has been increasingly attacking Israel’s critics. When asked on Thursday about reports that Netanyahu is angry about the MoU, Vance said that Trump “is the only world leader who listens to the nation of Israel at this time”, referring to the international condemnation of Israel’s war of genocide in Gaza and attacks on its neighbors.

“If I were in the Israeli cabinet, I would not be attacking a powerful ally that I have anywhere in the world,” he added.

Political analyst, Ori Goldberg, explained that this did not happen but “confused”.

“The criticism of Israel from the US leaders did not start because they suddenly gained a great deal of knowledge, it is because the reality has become inevitable,” he said. “Everything they say is correct. These are real bombs. Israel dragged them into the war and Netanyahu messed with Trump.”

Things just keep getting worse. On Saturday, the continuation of Israel’s attack on Lebanon made Iran again to close The Strait of Hormuz, an economic gateway where the closure was already known by many and brought Trump to the negotiating table.

“Two things are happening here, and each is a mirror of the other,” said Alon Pinkas, a former Israeli ambassador and consul general in New York.

“On the one hand, you have all the Trump cultists looking for an outsider to blame for luring their great leader into an endless war, and arresting Netanyahu.

“On the other hand, you have all the supporters of Netanyahu. They are also facing a war in Lebanon that they cannot get out of and the US agreement is what they are repeatedly told is Iran is stronger than the one that agreed to a good agreement under Obama,” added Pinkas.

“Ultimately, it’s a bad deal because it was a bad war,” he continued. “One always follows the other.”