Ted Cruz and Ron Wyden are trying to fight censorship with the bipartisan JAWBONE Act

A bill summary he said that according to the current law, the plaintiffs must prove that the coercion caused the removal or modification of the content. The bill would allow plaintiffs to sue and seek damages from “any government agency or employee that owns or operates a private company involved in media, AI, or broadcasting, regardless like my jaw it wins.”

The bill specifically authorizes monetary damages, because under current law, plaintiffs can obtain statutes that prohibit future or continuing violations, the brief said. With economic damage, government officials who conduct illegal investigations can be held accountable even after they leave office. The bill effectively limits financial compensation by allowing damages for damages but not damages.

Good “chokepoints” for light

The law also “requires agencies to provide certain communications with social media companies, AI companies, and advertisers in a place that has a public summary and adequate access to Congress, to help ensure that jawboning does not take place in secret,” the summary said.

The website in question will help people prove that their rights have been violated, the brief said. Without this, “opponents may struggle to prove that they have a jaw-dropping fact that the government has secretly spoken to private companies that pressure them. The American people may not even know that they have been tried by their government,” the summary said.

The article said that broadcast media, Internet services, and “intelligent speech production systems are essential to information and self-expression and to individual freedom of choice.”

The bill defines broadcasting to include FCC-licensed stations and national television stations that provide programming to affiliated stations. This means that forcing local stations and networks is breaking the law.

“The word ‘coerce’ means to do something harmful, hateful, or inappropriate, to mean the ability to do it, or to threaten to do something,” the bill said. The prohibition contains exceptions to lawful investigations, compliance with federal or state laws, and actions taken pursuant to a warrant.